odds and ends


In August 2009, a leading expert on chemical and biological arms control and-this-is-your-brain-on-drugscalled  for urgent efforts to stop new mind-altering drugs developed for medical purposes from being adopted by the military for use in warfare.

In an article in the U.S. journal Nature, British academic Malcolm Dando said civilian researchers in many countries seemed largely unaware of the danger and urged quick action to adapt a key arms pact to head it off.

“In the past 20 years, modern warfare has changed from predominantly large-scale clashes of armies to messy civil strife,” wrote Dando, citing the Bosnian conflict of the mid-1990s and current fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Chemical agents and even gene therapy being developed in civilian life science laboratories “are particularly suited to this style of warfare; it is not hard to find people in the military world who think they would be useful,” he declared.

Dando, Professor of International Security at Britain’s Bradford University, is a regular participant in U.N.-sponsored arms conferences and in Nature, he said attention should be focused on changing the 1993 global Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).

Currently the CWC, which went into effect in 1997 and to which 188 countries are signatories, bans all chemical weapons but excludes those used for law enforcement and riot control.

“‘Law enforcement’ could be taken by some to cover more than domestic riot control, which in certain circumstances would make it legal for the military to use agents such as fentanyl,” said Dando, referring to a powerful painkilling drug.

Fentanyl, a strong painkiller, Dando said, was deployed in a still unrevealed mixture by Russian special forces in 2002 to subdue Chechen militants who had seized a Moscow theater.

But its use led to the deaths of over 120 hostages among the theater-goers and Russian commandos who went into the theater with protective gear shot dead the incapacitated hostage-takers.

The Russian government will not reveal the type of gas because it may face similar attacks in the future, “

A former Russian defence ministry official, Viktor Baranets said: “Most likely the agent they chose was the gas known as Kolokol-1, the most promising of all psycho-chemical agents developed by the Soviet special services.”

He said the gas, known within Russia’s security community for some time, “spreads rapidly across broad areas, and can render a healthy person completely unconscious in 1 to 3 seconds”, but people with weak hearts or prone to vomiting could die from inhaling it.

Other agents being developed, said Dando, include oxytocin, dubbed the “love and cuddle” chemical which induces trust and whose emergence “opens up the possibility of a drug that could be used to manipulate people’s emotions in a military context.”

In a paper to be published soon in the scientific journal Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the professor focuses on recent US actions that have served to undermine the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. In a move that stunned the international community last July, the US blocked an attempt to give the convention some teeth with inspections, so that member countries could check if others were keeping the agreement.

Mr Dando believes Washington’s motive for torpedoing the deal, which had the support of its allies, was to maintain secrecy over US research work on biological weapons. He said that work includes:

  • CIA efforts to copy a Soviet cluster bomb designed to disperse biological weapons
  • A project by the Pentagon to build a bio-weapon plant from commercially available materials to prove that terrorists could do the same thing
  • Research by the Defense Intelligence Agency into the possibility of genetically engineering a new strain of antibiotic-resistant anthrax.

Jonathan Tucker, a chemical weapons expert at the US Institute for Peace in Washington, said much of the work on non-lethal weapons was being carried out by an institute under the US justice department but was funded by the Pentagon.

For the full story see Reuters coverage

eclipseWe’ve discussed in the past how there’s an arms race so to speak to see which of the uber rich has the biggest, bestest most totally tricked out super yacht. Roman Abramovich has been ahead of the game for a while but he’s still hard at work building perhaps the largest, coolest Bond villian yacht – heck it even out does those grand visions.  The 557-foot boat Eclipse, the price tag of which has almost doubled to almost $1.2 billion since original plans were drawn three years ago set sail this week with a slew of show-off features, from two helipads, two swimming pools and six-foot movie screens in all guest cabins, to a mini-submarine and missile-proof windows and hull to combat piracy.

Once it leaves the Blohm + Voss German shipyard, it will be fitted with a missile desence system in France. The master suite features a retractable roof, allowing the Chelsea football club owner and his girlfriend, Daria Zukhova, a former model, to sleep under the stars. Eclipse is likely to require a crew of at least 60 people, said to include a security team of hand-picked former veterans of the French Foreign Legion.

We’ve already read in the past that the Eclipse is outfitted with some type of light sensing windows (“glass” doesn’t seem an adequate word to describe it) that automatically become opaque upon sensing a bright flash. So much for the defensive posture – Ambramovich has also had installed an anti-paparazzi “shield”. Lasers sweep the surroundings and when they detect a CCD, they fire a bolt of light right at the camera to obliterate any photograph. According to the Times, these don’t run all the time, so friends and guests should still be able to grab snaps. Instead, they will be activated when guards spot the scourge of professional photography, paparazzi, loitering nearby.

While this all sounds ultra cool to me and I think the photogs should have to take some risk just to balance things out, of course you know some spoil sport and already raised that most reviled specter – lawyers. UK photo magazine Amateur Photographer asked a London lawyer about the legalities of destroying photos from afar. Here’s what he said: “intermeddling with goods belonging to someone else, or altering their condition, is a trespass to goods and will entitle the photographer to claim compensation without having to prove loss.”

Roman is due to take delivery of the yacht on December 22 — treating himself to the ultimate Christmas present so he can show off his new toy at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, docking the vessel off Cape Town and flying to matches by helicopter — assuming that Russia qualifies for the tournament. {z- One things for sure – we’ll be watching for the grand debut.}

For more information on the Eclipse – visit this Yacht Information page and here for Live Yachting

ecilpse abromovich

Next Page »